Question: Compile-errors in 3.1.10 

Forum: PCMCIA Installation and Configuration Issues
Date: 2000, Feb 15
From: Rolf Rander Naess rolfn

I am trying to compile 3.1.10 on a RedHat 6.1 system, currently running 2.2.12. #gcc --version 2.8.1 #ld -v GNU ld version 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1.0.25) and I get: gcc -MD -c -O2 -I../include -I/usr/src/linux/include -D__KERNEL__ -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -DMODVERSIONS -include /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h -DMODULE -DCARDBUS 3c575_cb.c 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_up': 3c575_cb.c:1206: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c:1207: structure has no member named `interrupt' 3c575_cb.c:1208: structure has no member named `start' 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_tx_timeout': 3c575_cb.c:1430: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_start_xmit': 3c575_cb.c:1532: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c:1552: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c: In function `boomerang_start_xmit': 3c575_cb.c:1589: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c:1634: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_interrupt': 3c575_cb.c:1653: structure has no member named `interrupt' 3c575_cb.c:1656: structure has no member named `interrupt' 3c575_cb.c:1667: structure has no member named `interrupt' 3c575_cb.c:1697: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c:1698: `NET_BH' undeclared (first use in this function) 3c575_cb.c:1698: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once 3c575_cb.c:1698: for each function it appears in.) 3c575_cb.c:1720: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c:1729: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c:1770: structure has no member named `interrupt' 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_down': 3c575_cb.c:1945: structure has no member named `start' 3c575_cb.c:1946: structure has no member named `tbusy' 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_close': 3c575_cb.c:1980: structure has no member named `start' 3c575_cb.c: In function `vortex_get_stats': 3c575_cb.c:2021: structure has no member named `start' make[1]: *** [3c575_cb.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/a/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.9/clients' make: *** [all] Error 2

[ Next-in-Thread ]  [ Next Message ] 

Messages Inline: [ 0 ]  [ 1 ] 

Some more info! Re: Question: Compile-errors in 3.1.10 (Rolf Rander Naess) Date: 2000, Feb 15 From: Rolf Rander Naess rolfn

Forgot to say: I'm compiling against kenel 2.3.45, I suppose this might be a problem. (I need to upgrade pcmcia to use this kernel, so I figured I should compile against it as well)

You left out the part about a 2.3.* development kernel Re: Question: Compile-errors in 3.1.10 (Rolf Rander Naess) Date: 2000, Feb 15 From: David Hinds <dhinds@pcmcia.sourceforge.org>

So... it looks like you're compiling 3.1.9 (not 3.1.10), and you're not actually building it for the 2.2.12 kernel you mention, you're building it against a 2.3.43 or newer development kernel. This combination won't work, due to API changes in the latest development kernels. You can try the latest beta on sourceforge.org in /pcmcia/NEW. -- Dave

Question: better combination? Re: You left out the part about a 2.3.* development kernel (David Hinds) Date: 2000, Feb 16 From: Luis Villa luge

David- I am having the same problem, and need a 2.3.x for the USB code. So: 1) How stable are those "NEW" packages? Will I have any luck with them at all or am I just wasting my time? 2) If they aren't particularly usable, how far back into the 2.3.x tree do I have to go to get a kernel that doesn't have the "improved" API? Obviously, this isn't the ideal solution, but if that is what it'll take... Thanks a bunch for everything you've done- Luis Villa (long time user, first time luser :)

Question: One other question Re: Question: better combination? (Luis Villa) Date: 2000, Feb 16 From: Luis Villa luge

One more thing: How does this package interface with the stuff in the kernel? Should I leave all that stuff compiled out, or does the package now depend on it, assuming that it is there? I'll be testing this shortly, but that kernel re-compile will take a while :) Luis

For post-2.3.36, you must use the modules from the kernel tree Re: Question: One other question (Luis Villa) Date: 2000, Feb 17 From: David Hinds <dhinds@pcmcia.sourceforge.org>

If you have a post-2.3.36 kernel, and the latest PCMCIA beta release, then you must use the PCMCIA stuff in the kernel; the PCMCIA package itself will only build the user-level PCMCIA utilities. -- Dave

[ Add Message ]  to: "Compile-errors in 3.1.10"

[ Members ]  [ Subscribe ]  [ Admin Mode ] 
[ Show Frames ]  [ Help for HyperNews at pcmcia-cs.sourceforge.net 1.10 ]