I have probed the pcnet_cs driver.
Because i have not found the hardware adress in my card
(with memory_cs), i have hardcoded it in config.opts.
Now i get a connection, but it is not working very well.
I belief there is a interrupt problem or a timimg problem.
This is the output from boot, ping and dmesg.
Can you pinpoint the problem ?
bootmsg:
Starting PCMCIA services: modulesLinux PCMCIA Card Services 3.0.6
kernel build: 2.0.36 #4 Mon Nov 1 22:57:02 MET 1999
options: [pci] [apm]
Intel PCIC probe:
TI 1131 PCI-to-CardBus at bus 0 slot 10, mem 0x68000000, 2 sockets
host opts [0]: [ring] [clkrun irq 12] [pci + serial irq] [no pci irq] [lat 1
68/176] [bus 32/34]
host opts [1]: [ring] [clkrun irq 12] [pci + serial irq] [no pci irq] [lat 1
68/176] [bus 35/37]
ISA irqs (scanned) = 3,4,7,10,11,15 status change on irq 15
cardmgr.
cardmgr[80]: starting, version is 3.0.6
cardmgr[80]: watching 2 sockets
cs: IO port probe 0x1000-0x17ff: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 0x330-0x337 0x378-0x37f 0x388-0x38f 0
x398-0x39f 0x4d0-0x4d7
cs: IO port probe 0x0a00-0x0aff: clean.
cardmgr[80]: initializing socket 1
cs: memory probe 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff: clean.
cardmgr[80]: socket 1: Billionton LNA-100B
Starting RPC portmap daemoncardmgr[80]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.0.36/n
et/8390.o'
cardmgr[80]: executing: 'insmod /lib/modules/2.0.36/pcmcia/pcnet_cs.o hw_addr=0x
00,0x10,0x60,0x30,0x01,0x86'
eth0: NE2000 Compatible: port 0x300, irq 11, hw_addr 00:10:60:30:01:86
cardmgr[80]: executing: './network start eth0'
net_interrupt(): irq 11 for unknown device.
Ping Output:
pino:~ # ping 192.168.100.20
PING 192.168.100.20 (192.168.100.20): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=10000.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=8001.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=13 ttl=128 time=7000.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=21 ttl=128 time=5001.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=24 ttl=128 time=4001.9 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=52 ttl=128 time=2000.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=62 ttl=128 time=1000.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=71 ttl=128 time=1000.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=78 ttl=128 time=1000.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=83 ttl=128 time=1000.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=84 ttl=128 time=1000.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=85 ttl=128 time=1002.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.20: icmp_seq=88 ttl=128 time=1000.4 ms
--- 192.168.100.20 ping statistics ---
92 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 85% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1000.3/3308.4/10000.6 ms
dmesg:
....
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x3 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=200.
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x3 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=200.
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x43 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x43, t=200.
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x3 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=200.
lp1 out of paper
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x3 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=200.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: unexpected TX-done interrupt, lasttx=20.
eth0: Too much work at interrupt, status 0x02
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x3 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=200.
eth0: Interrupted while interrupts are masked! isr=0x3 imr=0x0.
eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt? TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=200.
--
Markus
|
So close yet so far?
| |
|
News: first LNA-100B success
| |
|