Next-in-Thread Next Message

None Re: Some context would help 

Forum: PCMCIA Wireless Network Adapter Issues
Re: Question Receive interrupt does not seem to be incrementing properly (Richard Smith)
Re: None Some context would help (David Hinds)
Date: 2000, Aug 15
From: Richard A. Smith smithbone

On Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:59:48 -0700, David Hinds wrote:

>That isn't the exact message, and the rest of the output would be

Yeah.. I tried to wing it from memory. Should have mentioned that. Sorry.

>useful, but my guess is what it means is that you are using a wireless
>network card in a PCI host adapter in a desktop system and you haven't
>specified the right startup options to configure the adapter to use
>PCI interrupts.
>
>But without more context, that's just a guess.

My bad... I should know better. I was in the middle messing with various PNP bios 
settings and didn't prepare well enough.
 
I am using a RayLink wireless card with the adapter that came with it. But it's 
not PCI. That would probally work.  It's an ISA PNP adapter using the Ricoh 
RF5C296 bridge.

All appears to go without problems until I actually try to use the cards.  They 
both start networks when one should start and one should join.  (FWIW I can't get 
them to work under windows either)  Data on Cory's page and other web sources say 
that this is either a card failure or some sort of receive problem where the card 
dosen't get any data thus it starts a new network.

So far nothing in the debug level 5 output from ray_cs shows anything to be 
amiss.

When I found the network script and it mentioned RX seeming to have a problem I 
started to look at my IRQs'.  (I am in the middle of installing isapnptools now 
to see if I can find any more info)

Here's the output from test_network:  (more or less I am retyping)

----------

PCMCIA network settings are coming from /etc/pcmcia/network.opts

Checking network itnterface eth1 (ray_cs driver)

Kernel messages for eth1:
eth1:  RayLink, irq 5, hw_addr 00:00:8f:48:e3:03

current ifconfig setting
all pretty much std..
IP:   10.0.1.1
Bcast:  10.0.1.255
mask:  255.255.255.0
zeros on all the  RX, TX, etc stats:
Interrupt 5

The interface is configured and running
There hasn't been any traffic on this interface

There is a route to a gateway at 10.0.1.1

Pinging 10.0.1.1.... response received!
The device interrupt does not seem to be incrementing normally.

----------





--
Richard A. Smith                         Bitworks, Inc.               
rsmith@bitworks.com               501.846.5777                        
Sr. Design Engineer        http://www.bitworks.com   

Next-in-Thread Next Message

Messages Inline: 0 All Outline: 2 3 All

None Not sure if it is an interrupt issue; gateway set wrong?

Re: None Re: Some context would help (Richard A. Smith)
Date: 2000, Aug 15
From: David Hinds <dhinds@pcmcia.sourceforge.org>

Does /proc/interrupts show a non-zero interrupt count for the card?
If the count is 0, then try using a different irq (by excluding things
in /etc/pcmcia/config.opts).

> There is a route to a gateway at 10.0.1.1

There's something wrong with your network settings and this is
confusing the script.  Your gateway address seems to be the same as
your own IP address, which doesn't make any sense.

> Pinging 10.0.1.1.... response received!
> The device interrupt does not seem to be incrementing normally.

In this context, I think this doesn't mean anything: it thinks it is
pinging your gateway, but it is pinging the box itself, which doesn't
cause any packets to go out through the card.  So it won't produce any
interrupts.

I'll add a test to the script to complain if the gateway address is
the same as the IP address.

-- Dave
1. None Re: Not sure if it is an interrupt issue; gateway set wrong? by Richard Smith, 2000, Aug 15
2. None Raylink problem solved.. by Richard Smith, 2000, Aug 15
... 1 Message(s)
Re: Some context would help


Add Message to: "Re: Some context would help"

Members Subscribe Admin Mode Show Frames Help for HyperNews at pcmcia-cs.sourceforge.net 1.10